🔗 Share this article

Initially, Donald Trump gave the impression to embrace a strong position regarding the Ukrainian conflict. After issuing statements of "severe repercussions" during the summer if Russia's president continued blocking ceasefire talks, Trump finally enacted substantial sanctions on Russia's two largest energy firms, these major energy companies. This decision significantly impacted Putin's capability to fund his war effort in Ukraine.

However, through his recently unveiled detailed peace proposal for the conflict, reportedly developed by both nations' diplomats without Ukraine's or European input, Trump has seemingly returned to his Russia-friendly approach.

Favoring Military Action

This proposal would essentially benefit Putin for invading Ukraine while leaving Ukraine's political freedom in jeopardy. Despite bold declarations that "The nation's independence will be upheld", significant aspects of the proposal in reality compromise that very autonomy. Seen as a Kremlin dream would probably be a disaster for Ukraine.

Demonstrating his real-estate experience, Trump seems to consider the situation in Ukraine as a simple land disagreement, implying handing Putin a section of Ukrainian territory will please the leader. But, Putin's invasion is not simply about occupying a destroyed region of deindustrialized area in the Donbas region. It is about the nation's democratic governance – and Putin's clear intention to eliminate it so it stops acts as an enticing model for the Russian citizens of the accountable government that Putin's increasing authoritarian rule prevents them.

Border Giveaways

Although freezing in place the currently divided Ukrainian provinces of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's plan would force Ukraine to abandon the entire Donetsk region. Aside from benefiting the Russian Federation with territory that its troops have been failed to capture in over a ten years of fighting, this concession would leave Ukrainian defensive positions critically weakened.

Donetsk is the location of Ukraine's well-known "defensive line", the entrenched military defenses that are a key barrier to Russian advances. Trump would have the Ukrainian military abandon these fortifications, giving Putin a open way to Kyiv in case he eventually decide to restart the conflict.

Defense Restrictions

Additionally, in a action that would facilitate renewed fighting easier for the Russian military, the plan would mandate the nation to cut the numbers of its armed forces from their existing large number soldiers to a maximum of six hundred thousand. Importantly, Trump's plan sets no equivalent limits on the invading army.

Seemingly as a gesture to Russia's efforts to characterize Ukraine's democratically elected administration as radicals, the proposal states: "All Nazi doctrine and practices must be rejected and prohibited." As if to emphasize this point, it insists that "The nation will hold elections in 100 days" of a ceasefire agreement. However, the proposal imposes no obligation that Putin endanger his dictatorship by holding democratic processes in Russia.

Defense Assurances

Admittedly, the plan includes the Russian Federation pledge not to "enter bordering nations" and to "establish in legislation its stance of non-aggression towards European nations and Ukraine". However taking into account that the Russian leadership has breached comparable treaties in the history – including the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in which the Russian government committed to honor the nation's territorial integrity in exchange for surrendering its Soviet-era nuclear arsenal, and the previous peace deals, in which Russia agreed to a truce and a handback of seized land in the region to Ukrainian control – how should we have confidence in Russia on this occasion?

This explains the Ukrainian government has been so insistent on international security guarantees. Although the initiative promises a "decisive unified armed reaction" should Russia renew its invasion, and includes that "Ukraine will receive reliable security guarantees", the particulars vary from vague to troubling. The proposal would not only prevent Ukraine alliance membership but also prevent alliance nations from deploying military personnel on Ukrainian territory, thereby precluding the security presence, likely commanded by Britain and France, on which Ukraine had been relying to stop Russia from rebuilding his weakened forces, restocking, and resuming aggression.

Global Reaction

Another side agreement apparently would provide Ukraine with a alliance-like security guarantee, in which any subsequent "serious, planned, and sustained military assault" by Russia on the country "shall be regarded as an attack threatening the peace and security of the transatlantic community." This implies a defense action. Yet different from a strong Ukraine's armed forces – the nation's best protection against future Russian aggression – the effectiveness of the parallel accord would hinge on the willingness of Western powers, like the US administration, to respond through arms to Russia's aggression, something they have {not